Gender-Responsive Grievance Mechanisms in Climate Projects: Lessons from M4CR in Indonesia

Abstract

This study examines how the Feedback and Grievance Redress Mechanism (FGRM) under Indonesia’s Mangroves for Coastal Resilience (M4CR) project mainstreams Gender Equality, Disability, and Social Inclusion (GEDSI) to strengthen social accountability and ensure equitable benefits. Using a public policy perspective in political science, this research adopts a qualitative method: analysis of policy documents (Project Appraisal Document, Environmental and Social Management Framework, Stakeholder Engagement Plan, Labor Management Procedures) and administrative project data (GRM logs and M&E indicators) across four priority provinces. The analysis is guided by the policy cycle and an intersectionality lens; analytical strategies include directed content analysis, multilevel actor mapping, and cross-province comparative analysis. Initial findings indicate that the FGRM design meets formal standards, yet implementation gaps persist in access for women and persons with disabilities (literacy, mobility, privacy) and in survivor-centerer handling of SEA/SH. We identify prerequisites for effective implementation: designated female focal points, safe anonymous channels, disaggregated data practices, and budgeted community-based outreach. Limitations include heterogeneous administrative records across provinces. The paper offers an operational evaluation framework for gender-responsive FGRM integrated into project M&E systems; its novelty lies in coupling GEDSI indicators with social accountability to map design–delivery gaps in a national-scale, nature-based program.